Author Topic: Oculus Rift S vs Oculus Quest  (Read 217 times)

Offline owlnonymous

  • Level 8: Psi Corps
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Location: St Petersburg
  • Posts: 2822
  • BEWARE, OWL LIVES!
    • Owlnonymous: Pinball and Arcade Streaming
Oculus Rift S vs Oculus Quest
« on: May 08, 2019, 05:11:38 PM »
With the Oculus Rift S and Oculus Quest being released soon, I am trying to decide which experience I want as my first foray into VR.

The Oculus Rift S has a higher refresh rate, but used a single LCD panel with no IPD adjustment. My PC is VR ready, so the fidelity of games offered and selection of library would be greater.

The tetherless and portability of the Oculus Quest VR might be worth the lost in graphics and smaller library. The Quest uses two OLED displays, with greater blacks. It does however run at a lower refresh rate.

Which headset are you guys interested in? If you have owned a VR set in the past, how nice would it to be tetherless?

PINS: Jurassic Park Stern, Whirlwind, The Machine: Bride of PinĀ·bot, Spectrum, Paragon
WTB: Iron Maiden Premium, NGG, Hang Glider, Prospector, Andromeda, Cosmic Gunfight
TWITCH: http://twitch.tv/owlnonymous

Offline Niloc

  • Original Member
  • Level 9: Grid Champion
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Location: Tampa
  • Posts: 3080
Re: Oculus Rift S vs Oculus Quest
« Reply #1 on: May 09, 2019, 08:24:58 PM »
Not having the tether is VERY nice, but of course the trade off is that you'll never have the horsepower of a high-end PC behind it.

I did the Kickstarter for the Oculus, got the dev kit version and got a full Rift for free because of it (unexpected bonus).

I also bought the Oculus Go last December when it was on sale for $179.

I actually like the Go more and use it more often.

The full Rift is a pain in the ass to setup and keep connected to a PC all the time (unless you've got a high-end PC devoted to just that). Then you also need the sensors, wires all over for that, and a lot of space to use it in some games.

The Go is way more pick-up-and-play, and I love the fact that you don't even have to use headphones with it (though you can) - the built-in speakers are actually quite good.

For every type of VR I've tried yet though, the biggest problem is that it seems to be aimed at 5 to 15 minute sessions. No depth.

What I personally want is a system where I can put it on, sit down on the couch, have it stay cool and comfortable for hours, and play an immersive modern RPG type game.

There's a conversion of Skyrim for VR, but I already played Skyrim years ago, and since it's not designed for VR I'm not sure how much benfit there really is.

We're very much still in the early adopter stage unfortunately, and it may never get past that. Ideally the headset should be not much more than those wrap-around sunglasses old people sometimes wear, like these;



With, at most, one thin break-away wire connecting it to a PC; but we're still probably 10 years away from something like that, and VR may well fizzle out and die well before then.
The total number of VR headsets sold so far is pretty small vs. game consoles.

« Last Edit: May 10, 2019, 04:03:59 AM by Niloc »

Offline yesimbrandon

  • Level 3: Hologram
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2015
  • Location: Jacksonville
  • Posts: 233
Re: Oculus Rift S vs Oculus Quest
« Reply #2 on: June 04, 2019, 09:56:10 PM »
I originally bought the Rift a while back and enjoyed it, but setup was a pain. I don't have an amazing space and pretty regularly I have to adjust the sensors, and you're always wary of that wire attached to you.

I purchased the Quest and have been very impressed so far. You're limited by the power of it, but cutting the wires has been very freeing. My only regret was getting the 128gb and not the 64gb.

The one big downside though is the price for games. There's a lot of games I'd play on the Quest but I already own them on the rift and I'm not paying full price again.

Pins: Deadpool Pro, Iron Maiden Pro, Game of Thrones Pro, Doctor Who, The Shadow, Meteor