I agree and think the focus should always remain on the main clans. 3 is simply a special mission clan and is not on the same level as 1 and 2. It's size and even it's existence should be subject to the needs of 1 and 2. Having said that, we created 3 to address certain problems, and while those problems have been addressed, it has created new problems. Among them, it seems to have contributed to allowing some of the standards in 1 to slip. We've attempted to fix that by kicking members (and even elders) who are no longer following the rules, and by rotating in members from 3 temporarily to help with donations in 1. I think the added capability that 3 gives us outweighs the problems it creates, and if we do away with 3, we will have to find a different solution to all of the problems that brought about it's creation in the first place. We now have 10 members in 3 that are farming. I think that's probably enough members for 3 to function properly, and when they return to 1 or 2, they will be stronger and be able to offer better donations. I haven't heard from anyone else planning on coming over to 3 at this time, and between 1 and 2, that means we have 80 members in the main clans. If rules are being enforced, and everyone is living up to our clan name, then donations shouldn't be a problem.
That's my 2 cents, and please understand that I would personally prefer to spend my days in 1 or 2. My primary reason for being over in 3 is strategic - to building up the clan and provide this capability to it. If the consensus among elders is that we have better solutions to address why 3 was created in the first place, then we can certainly shut down 3 as it's no longer needed. Is there a better way forward?