I didn't really have a problem with any of that. The biased press got called out on relatively inconsequential lies. The bigger message from the Trump administration to the press was that they would hit back and that the administration would bypass the press whenever they felt the press wasn't honest. Previous administrations and most established power brokers have always taken the public stance that the press is honest and largely impartial - the impression that the press themselves push. The Trump administration does not start with that assumption and the message yesterday was a warning to the press. I agree with it. It remains to be seen however if that will cause the opposite problem and if the press will be too scared to report the truth when it comes to future Trump administration scandals. After 8 years of the press in the pocket of the Obama administration because they largely agreed with their ideology, I don't want them to also be in the pocket of the Trump administration because they're too scared of him.
Main line Intelligence analysts are not the same thing as senior level political appointees in the Intelligence community. The people who figure out specifically what is happening are usually not the same people who take that information and couch it it political terms and brief it. If there was a Trump "war" with the "intelligence community" as the press liked to report, it was with the old Obama appointees, not with the analysts nugging away at the problem set.
If you want to find fault with the first few days of the new administration... just look at his speech. Other than the parts about the 'best intersts of soverign nations', inner city problems, and citizenship... the rest of the speech was pretty dumb. He was exceedingly long on promisses that he has no ability to deliver - that's not inspirational, that's just dumb.
